What Some People Will Compare – Keep and Evernote?

There have been articles and blog posts out the wazoo over the past few days, after Google released Keep, it’s new note taking add-on to Google Drive. The bulk of them have been comparing Keep to Evernote, pondering whether the Big G’s new feature is an Evernote killer.

It’s amazing what people will use to put a story out.

Now look, I’m a big fan of Google (although I also have lots of reservations about them) and I use MANY of their products. I have 5 Gmail accounts that I can remember. Drive, docs, calendar, Play music, Now, on and on – Google surely knows my life better than I do at this point. Keep is a tool I’m sure to use – for something. But replace Evernote? Really, have you even used Keep?

Bicycle vs Cadillac

Keep is handy, no doubt about it – if you are a Google devotee, and use Drive regularly, and have an Android device. Otherwise, it’s really pretty weak. As a standalone note-taking app, I can probably think of around 10 or 12 others off the top of my head that are better. And when I say better, I mean way better. You can’t even sort your notes in Keep other than with different colored tiles. No tags? Come on.

Evernote is confusing to some people because of the extensive features it does have, and because a lot of folks still haven’t grasped the use of or power of tags. I guess G released Keep in the basic form that they did to attract those very people. But the bloggers comparing it to Evernote are not fashion writers for goodness sake, they’re tech writers, which can mean only one thing: two big names in one article gets readers.

Keep is a Huffy bike compared to the Escalade that Evernote is, and a bike with training wheels at that. It’s embarrassing to see the likes of Wired, the Huffington Post, ZDnet, and PC World considering whether Keep is an Evernote killer, regardless of their final analysis. At least Gizmodo stated in their article title that it’s a non-starter issue.

The Future Isn’t Here Yet

I’m also not stupid, and I’m fairly up on consumer tech, particularly web and mobile apps. I know how Google plays their game, and Keep could very well become a player in the extreme noting world, if they continue development based on adoption. Otherwise it’s still very useful, it’s just not what everyone’s saying it is.

So wait until there is a comparison to make before you start making comparisons, Mr. tech-writer-for-a-big-site. Until then, you aren’t helping the public, you are fishing for hits on your site. Stop it.

As a post-script, I have been pondering running a series of posts about tech, mobile/web apps, and related items. So, since I value the opinions of both readers of this blog :), would it be out of place or distracting to to do this here, or should I start a new wp site for this? Let me know what you think.


Being Organic


I’ve been writing freelance for a couple of years now, and I’ve gone through more learning experiences than I can even think of in that time. I’ve also seen that there is more out there than can ever be mastered by on person, even someone as awesome as me 🙂

I’ve also struggled with, tried, and railed against a number of tactics and regular practices in the wonderful world of online existence and working. I may be wrong, I may be right, but either way I pretty much know where I stand for the moment.

Straddling the Line

As I mentioned in another post, SEO is a strategy that I struggle with. I don’t mean that I have a hard time with the mechanics of it, I mean that its use borders on a questionable tactic for me. I definitely see the benefits, and to a degree the necessity of it. There are more websites than there are people on the planet as of last year, so trying to get traffic to your site in that huge sea definitely takes some effort. the problem for me is that SEO is overused and relied on as THE driver of traffic by way too many people and companies. Thankfully, Google is trying to correct this with their algorithm updates, and I hope they continue to do so.

That being said, I do think that it is a good practice to use keywords and meta data in extreme moderation, but only because of the current climate. This site, for example, and most sites which I have set up for myself over time, don’t have any of either, or at least not enough to be considered. Sure, I link to my other posts and other sites that I write for, but my primary motivation is not to get more clicks. I’m always linking to things that I honestly think you would want to read.

Social Media, Guest Posts, Backlinking, etc

That’s a hodgepodge of a subtitle, but it was the first three things that came to mind. What I’m trying to convey is that there are so many channels and strategies that people use that it’s mind boggling. And to me it’s silly, but that’s because of the reason in the next paragraph. I love social media. I love using it for personal and family connections, for business connections, for sharing interesting things, and for learning from others. I write about using it regularly here. I’m not opposed to the idea of guest posts, either, or posting links like I just did. What bothers me is when these things are used for strictly monetary or traffic purposes and not for honest informational purposes.

Again, I keep having to walk a fine line here because I have nothing against money or traffic. I live off of them. I guess I just take cues or share mindsets with the likes of Chris Brogan, people who understand that the human connection and the desire to help others needs to come first. It’s just more important than money or fame.

Writing vs Business

One more straddle before I leave you. All this straddling is hurting me in unpleasant places. I’m a writer. I’m also a businessman. I write for money because it allows me to write. If it were only about money, I could go back the business world I left and make more, but I’m doing what I love now. I also get to share with people more and learn from others more, which makes my life so much better than it was before. Getting to the title of this post, I want to remain as organic as possible, meaning I want to succeed based primarily on what I write and on people reading, enjoying, and sharing what I write. If I’m writing crap but getting a million hits a day, that’s losing to me. If I have ten people who really enjoy what I write and let me know it, that’s winning.

So I continue to learn about the dark side, the business side of writing and blogging, because there is always something to glean and use in moderation. My goal remains, however, to write quality content and write it as well as I can. I can do better, I know. I rarely even go back and edit anything like this before I publish it, and it probably shows. I just hope that whoever reads it enjoys it, learns something from it, or is able to teach me something. But that’s just me.

As always, I beg for your comments. Not so that my site looks better (look at it after all, it’s kind of sad), but so that I will know that someone enjoyed it or so that someone smarter than me will perhaps leave something I can learn from. Thanks for reading.

SEO, The Rachel Maddow Show, and my computer

What do the three things listed in this title have in common?

They’re all crappy. But let’s leave my computer out of this, it’s just old.

Fake Hype

On seeing a news item this morning about the aforementioned *ahem* “news” person, my blood began getting hot all over again about a subject that drives me nuts – SEO. Before I elaborate, let’s discuss what I read.

Apparently the obnoxious program host or the floundering network she works for has been maintaining hundreds of spambot Twitter accounts posting the same messages in an attempt to boost her show’s visibility. This is not surprising, given that in economic terms the network should have gone under years ago. Thankfully Twitter has suspended the accounts. This the same day that another essentially un-watched show from the same network reportedly has hit the lowest viewership since it’s inception.

The question arises: Why the need to artificially inflate the visibility? The answer is simple: no one watches it because it’s just not a good showIf it were, the viewership would be better than, say, the average YouTube video. But it’s not. So the solution, according to the geniuses at MSNBC, is to fake it.

A Fake by Any Other Name

Which brings me to SEO. There is nothing wrong with using tags or keywords in order to help people find content that they may be searching for. Unfortunately, this is not what SEO means anymore. It has become a game of “push it to the top” in order to make money. There is also nothing wrong with making money, and a good product or service will do that without “faking it”.

We are living in a time when scruples are usually near the bottom of the list of marketers, if they make the list at all. I do believe, thankfully, that this is being minimized with newer and ever changing algorithms on search and with the rise of thought leaders like Seth Godin and Chris Brogan, who emphasize real connections and “permission marketing”.

The results of faking it are the same as any underhanded method of promotion: short-term gains, long-term reputation failure. It eventually come to light (content mills, are you listening?).

I give advice based on principles, not dollar signs – although the two are not mutually exclusive by any means. I’m also not leading the marketing for a Fortune 500 company, so take it as you will.

The bottom line is that if you create good content and promote honestly and with human connections, you will succeed. If you can’t succeed that way, please find something else to do and stop poisoning the airwaves and screens with crap just so that you don’t have to find something that you are actually good at.